Guerlain – Shalimar Millésime Rose – Pink Shalimar For A New Audience?

Notes: bergamot, rose water, almond, Damask rose, Rose de Mai, incense, vanilla, patchouli.

I always look forward to the new Shalimar flanker each year. This time, Guerlain highlights rose in Shalimar Millésime Rose. The original Shalimar doesn’t feature rose prominently, so it’s an interesting choice to introduce it now, especially since other notes like leather haven’t been explored yet. But rose it is, and I’m not complaining; it’s very nicely executed. However, much like last year’s L’Essence, it feels somewhat mass-appealing and detached from the original.

The rose starts very pink.

In the first few minutes after applying Millésime Rose, I questioned what Guerlain had created. The bright neon pink of Delina immediately came to mind, as well as the horror of Akro’s Crush. Thankfully, the fragrance settles, though for the life of the scent, I perceive it in various shades of pink. The fragrance smells better on skin than on paper. As with most perfumes, it blooms best with a careful application—too many sprays can make it overly cloying. Two to three sprays seem to hit the sweet spot.

I can see why people have compared it to Rose Chérie. Both fragrances share a youthful, playful character, with a powdered, confectionery quality. The bitter almond note that I perceive in both scents takes the edge off the sweetness, ensuring that neither fragrance veers into overly childish territory.

Guerlain lists three rose ingredients in their pyramid: rose water, Damask rose, and May rose. These roses exhibit powdery, gourmand, and fresh facets. Millésime Rose is always bright and never dark, despite its jammy qualities. The fresh cut-through of the rose water note has me envisioning fields of pink roses blooming in the springtime. However, the experience might have been different. Often, if sweet pink rose scents (see Akro Crush) aren’t executed perfectly, they can evoke associations with shampoo, Starburst sweets, or cotton candy instead of a natural aroma.

I don’t think it’s quite as cosmetic/powdery as Rose Chérie, and my comparisons shift more toward L’Essence over time. Indeed, the base notes in Millésime Rose start to reveal some of the vanillic character of last year’s flanker. If there’s one thing we can count on, it’s that Guerlain consistently delivers a solid vanilla foundation. The pink rose, now far less neon than in the opening, begins to fuse with the balsamic vanilla base, and the scent becomes a more muted, creamy pink. It feels subdued at times, and purposely lacks the original’s grandiose feel and layered nuances.

I enjoy its simple feel, though. Millésime Rose is far easier to take than Shalimar, though I do detect some smoky, leathery nuances in the base. I see this flanker as Delphine Jelk and Guerlain catering to a new audience, perhaps aiming not to intimidate anyone with the animalic bite of the original—a Shalimar for those who don’t enjoy Shalimar.

To illustrate my point, I first tried Millésime Rose in store with my Shalimar-averse mum. She preferred Millésime Rose over the classic. In fact, she liked Millésime Rose more than the new Chanel fragrance, Coco Mademoiselle Crush Absolu, and she’s a huge Chanel fan. I did too, although it’s not a radical game-changing piece of work. It certainly didn’t have me dancing around like a prospector who has struck gold. Thankfully, because I would have looked pretty stupid dancing a jig in front of my mum and the Guerlain sales assistant. Although if I had, the SA might have taken pity on me and offered me a decant or sample. Alas, no samples and no eureka moments, but some solid work to enjoy from Jelk and Guerlain.

I wonder what Guerlain will give us next year? Will it be leather? For some reason, I’m thinking violet. Though I hope I’m wrong.

Note: Bottle image courtesy of Guerlain. All other images are my own. The roses are from my garden.

10 thoughts on “Guerlain – Shalimar Millésime Rose – Pink Shalimar For A New Audience?”

  1. Firstly, your roses are gorgeous, dear Daniel. And you’ve written about this Guerlain in a most insightful way. It sounds pretty and appealing. Will try it when I see it.

  2. “Shalimar for those who don’t enjoy Shalimar” – it might have a chance with me, then! I also enjoyed your rose photos, which illustrate the pinkness nicely.

    1. Thank you, Nose Prose. Yes, pretty much. If I had tested it without knowing the name, I might not even have recognised it as Shalimar.

  3. Once again, Daniel, your photos are beautiful. I appreciate your impressions of Shalimar Millésime Rose. As someone who loves the original Shalimar, I find this prettier version a bit too cleaned up for modern tastes. I wasn’t particularly impressed with L’Essence. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a perfectly fine perfume, but it didn’t leave a lasting impression. I did find Shalimar Millésime Rose a bit more interesting. I wonder when the Shalimar train will come to a stop.

    1. Thanks very much, Flaconneur. I agree, it’s hard to usurp the original. There’s a reason it’s been around for so long. As long as it’s making commercial sense, it’s hard to see the train stopping anytime soon.

  4. I remember thinking “Hello Nahema, my old friend” on first spray.
    All the Millesimes seem to be Shalimar for those who don’t like Shalimar. I’m a case in point. I enjoy all but the Vanilla Planifolia. Whilst Jelk insists L’Essence is the same formula, I found MVP to be spikier, more akin to AA Bosca Vanilla.
    Is it possible to have a Millesime (this years crop) of leather? I guess Osmanthus would do it but it certainly wouldn’t be bringing out a note from the OG

    1. Yes, they’ve really made this line its own thing. There doesn’t seem to be some differences between L’Essence and MVP, I agree. Osmanthus would be an interesting one, considering it’s not in Shalimar at all. But then again, rose doesn’t play much of a role in it either, so who knows. We will have to wait and see.

Leave a Reply